The “Greener Living” headline on the cover of the local Metro newspaper today caught my attention. It turned out to be an add sponsored by a bottled water company!
The paper included a four page insert that features tips about Zero Waste, stories about things like Extended Producer responsibility and the environment. I was bemused and a little annoyed to read that “Metro has partnered with Dasani to “teach Canadians about Choices” Really?
Clever marketing schemes like this disguise the truth, and while I appreciate the fact that some information in this ad is actually factual, the bigger story is the Green Washing of this product.
Most people are aware of the environmental catastrophe that has resulted from the bottled water industry. Companies like Dasani (owned by Coca-Cola) want to green their image and help ease consumer concerns by creating plastic bottles made out of plant materials instead of the traditional petroleum plastics. The fact is that we are facing a food crisis, we are also dealing with a global garbage disaster, with a major source of the this garbage being disposable water bottles.(plastic or otherwise)
1 second — that’s 90,000 bottles per minute
From the reuseit site;
Fast Facts on Disposable Bottles
- 2,480,000 tons of plastic bottles and jars were thrown away in one year (2008).
- Tap water is cleaner, cheaper and healthier than store-bought water.
- 60 billion single-use drink containers were purchased in 2006, and 3 out of 4 were thrown out directly after use.
- Plastic bottles are among the most prevalent source of pollution found on our beaches.
Understandably water bottle companies are now taking a new approach and turning to non petroleum based plastic for the bottles. This does not stop consumers from throwing them away.
Bottled water has been proven to be less regulated then public drinking water, it is more expensive and destructive to the environment, from the natural disruption in water flow at the source through the manufacturing and transporting of the water itself. It carries a large carbon footprint.
Single use items and products made to sooth our conscious, without long term thoughts about the impact these products have on our planet and sustainability are just a ploy to confuse matters.
Using Sugar cane Ethanol From Brazil is suppose to give us all a happy kumbaya feeling about this choice, but it leaves a bad taste behind.
When we choose to turn food into fuel, packaging, or anything other then nourishment, while millions of people around the world,(especially in places like Brazil) don’t have enough to eat each day it is not responsible. The production of sugar cane entails mono-cropping, the extensive use of pesticides, and perpetuates poverty. We have to question the ethics here, and the reality of what choosing to support this product really means.
It is not just another choice. The reality of the matter is this; if we support products that harm the people and the planet we will all be forced to deal with the consequences.

In the realm of educators, John Taylor Gatto is somewhat of an anomaly. He was a New York City school teacher for thirty years. Over his career he earned many distinctive accolades including New York City, and State School Teacher of the Year many times. What is different about Gatto is obvious if you have read any of his books and essays published over the years. He feels we need less schooling, and real choices in how we educate our children.
I am a huge fan of his, and with each of his books I read, I am more convinced that our decision to home school our children is the right one.

Recently I picked up Dumbing us Down, The Exausted School and I have just finished reading A Different Kind of Teacher. The latter is a perfect description of John Gatto. His ideas and appreciation of what young people are capable of is an affirmation of what I have always believed.
“Genius is an exceedingly common human trait..”
In A different kind of Teacher Gatto asks just how public are our public schools?
He writes;
” I feel ashamed that so many of us can not imagine a better way to do things than locking children up all day in cells instead of letting them grow up knowing their families, mingling with the world, assuming real obligations, striving to be independent and self-reliant and free”
He goes into great depths writing about what the true history of compulsory schooling actually is. Do people know they have a choice? The hows and whys of “public schooling” is an education in itself.
The oppressive influence of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and their determination to build an efficient industrial state, led them to a plan to systematize the rearing of the young.
“At the core of this social strategy was the removal of important decisions from the familial and individual control and their reassignment to the legion of specialists.”
“Without personal command over time and without the rights to associate freely with others and to speak freely, life begins to lose its meaning.”
“.. important life choices are not the proper province of any professional establishment“
“Whole people resist being told what to do and so are natural enemies of schooling“
Gatto encourages people to seek the truth, for themselves and their children. He asserts that schools are not designed to encourage independent thought, creative or scientific minds. Look at history and you can plainly see that the school system is not broken, it is functioning exactly as it was designed to. The real problem is that we have surpassed the old design and need a new model to overcome the society of mindless consumption and bankrupt morality that persists in the west today.
” To be free you need to celebrate your own history, humble and tormented as it might be, and the history of your own parents and grandparents, howsoever that history be marked by scars and mistakes. It is the only history you will ever have; reject it and you reject yourself.”
“Live free or you won’t really be alive at all.”
Originally published November 2009
The Huffington post ran an article recently about the massive sit in going on in front of the White house right now. The protest is over the Keystone XL Pipeline, planned to run from the Canadian tar sands to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico. The project has garnered protests on both sides of the border.

This New York Times editorial opposes the pipeline, sighting two main concerns; “the risk of oil spills along the pipeline, which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, (including drinking water for millions of people and ground water used for over 30% of the United States agricultural needs) and the fact that the extraction of petroleum from the tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions than conventional production does.”
Building this pipeline would double production (extraction) of oil over the next decade to more than 1.8 million barrels a day. While creating an equally alarming rise in green house gas emissions and cutting down at least 740,000 acres of boreal forest — a natural carbon reservoir.
This Keystone Pipeline Infographic clearly documents the 12 SPILLS that have already occurred in the one year old Keystone 1 pipeline.
Can anyone stop the corporations and two governments that are set on putting profits before people?
Originally published March 22, 2011
Today around the world people will demonstrate, write blog posts, think and talk about the issues surrounding water. Lack of water, the polluting of it, bottling it, public water ways sold for profit. Indeed there is a lot of interest in the water in our own backyards.
As another World Water Day arrives the time has never been better to consider the state of water, in our taps and around the world. In Canada we are flanked by two Oceans and have the most fresh water, and best drinking water in the world. We also have a pressing need to protect this natural resource that is our heritage and human right.
The Council of Canadians, a group of citizens that supports social action, urges Canadians to protect the water that belongs to all of us. They have issued an action alert a call out to British Coloumbians to take notice of the governments plans to modernise the water act.
Alarming propositions like the introduction of a Water Market that would deregulate controls over who uses the water and for what. Removing any prioritising of water for the people of this province. This is our natural resource. How it will be managed, and who, if anyone, should profit from the use of it needs to be determined. There is a world water forum being held in Brussels, and also currently under negotiation is a trade agreement, much like NAFTA, with the EU that would givve access to the rivers of B.C. as part of the deal as well.
Who should have access to this water? If it is a human right we can not keep it all for ourselves, but surely we realise the absolute need to protect our own access to this water. The water in British Columbia belongs to the people, animals and plants who live here. It is ours and not for sale to the highest bidder. Protecting this resources is our responsibility. Any government or individuals who would stand to profit from this process does not act in the best interest of it’s citizens.
Fraser River 2010 Sapperton Landing
TAKE ACTION
*A new provincial Water Act is expected to be introduced in 2012. Tell the BC government that you do not want the introduction of a water market to allocate water under the new Water Act. Ask the government to support an allocation system that provides hierarchy of use prioritising ecological and social needs.
1) Though the ability for resident’s to engage has be significantly limited in recent months you are able to engage with the process by posting to the ‘Living Water Smart’ blog: (http://blog.gov.bc.ca/livingwatersmart/) or email ian.graeme@gov.bc.ca.
2) With the political uncertainty surrounding this process, it is extremely important to raise this issue during the leadership races of all the political parties and to demand that candidates make a commitment to preventing a water market from being introduced in any future legislation. Contact your local MLA today and make sure that all leadership candidates make their position clear.
*From the Council of Canadians Website.
This year February 9th will again be “National Sweater Day” supported by the World Wildlife Fund Canada (WWF)
In an effort to demonstrate the power of individual actions equalling one big statement, dozens of retailers including grocery giant Loblaw have agreed to participate by lowering their stores temperatures by 3 degrees and wearing a sweater instead.
Wearing a sweater is a symbolic way people can participate in the ongoing dialogue about energy conservation and personal consumption.
Office workers, businesses and schools alike are encouraged to book a call from granny to be reminded about the big event.
By wearing the ugly sweater from the back of your closet you can help too. There are prizes to be won, so spread the word and sign up!
Take action, its easy and fun, and you really can make a difference!

originally posted February 17th 2011

If someone thinks that love and peace is a cliche that must have been left behind in the Sixties, that’s his problem.
Love and peace are eternal.
John Lennon






www.350.org"